As I was beginning to collect resources about creativity and how it is understood in the context of mathematics education earlier this month, I was surprised to find a large number of articles focusing on the instruction of ‘gifted and talented’ students.
Since I began teaching, I have had no real interest in students identified in this way. They’re somewhat less interesting to teach, quite frankly, because they’re most likely going to learn the content no matter what you teach. Most of students have a great deal of support at home, which has allowed their intellect and curiosity to be displayed to their full extent. Many of these students also are identified in this way also just because they happen to learn in a way that schools typically expects students to learn. As a teacher, you don’t have to do much in the way of reflecting upon and adjusting your practice in order to get these students to reach course curriculum goals.
I learned a lot more about teaching from my ‘level one’ classes than my ‘honors’ or AP groups. These students forced me to think about how to present the essence of mathematics that makes it so captivating.
Seeing the ‘gifted’ students being called out in particular as being creative made me think more about the difference between the students who are viewed as ‘good at math’ and those who are not.
Is creativity the thing that makes people think certain students are gifted? If so, doesn’t that imply that creativity is the sign of a good mathematician, which should make it the goal of math instruction? And yet, we focus on teaching mostly skills to the students who are already succeeding, rather than helping them to become creative in mathematics. This means we are giving up on these students ever being truly proficient in mathematics.
Or, maybe the implication is slightly different — creativity isn’t the thing that causes folks to identify a student as gifted; ability to answer math questions of some sort is. But, the amount of studies on gifted students and creativity still demonstrates that we see more creativity in the gifted students. This tells me that creativity is a tool that helps these students to succeed in their math classes. Again, why are we not finding a way to give this tool to all students?
Overall, it seems to me that if researchers and educators note overlap in the students they consider to be ‘creative’ and the students they consider to be ‘gifted,’ then not making creativity an important part of math education for all students is hugely problematic. The issue further complicated by the economic, gendered, and racial differences between students who are identified as ‘gifted’ and those who are not.